Science Agora Symposium ^|^ldquo;What Can Be Understood and What Cannot Be Understood with Science and Technology^|^rdquo;
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Can delusions be understood linguistically?
Delusions are widely believed to reflect disturbed cognitive function, but the nature of this remains elusive. The "un-Cartesian" cognitive-linguistic hypothesis maintains (a) that there is no thought separate from language, that is, there is no distinct mental space removed from language where "thinking" takes place; and (b) that a somewhat broadened concept of grammar is responsible for besto...
متن کاملCan activity be understood out of subjectivity?
The PSR echo a crisis of the relation of the organization with the subjectivity, which is at the same time a crisis of the relation of the organization with the reality that subjectivity is confronting through activity. Thus, they also raise, with ergonomics, the question to know which place it grants itself to subjectivity in the relation health-effectiveness.
متن کاملCan chronic muscular pain be understood?1.
Chronic muscular pain is often regarded as incomprehensible or indefinable when the doctor "can't find anything" on examination. However, the physiotherapist often detects physical signs in these patients: changes in posture, holding breath, tense and hard musculature, and poor balance. The findings are dependent on what is being sought. The view of the body as ambiguous, as something a person ...
متن کاملProduction preferences cannot be understood without reference to communication
MacDonald (2013) proposes that comprehenders are sensitive to statistical patterns in their language input (Claim 1). These patterns are hypothesized to result from speakers’ preferences in production, aggregated over the population (Claim 2). Production preferences are taken to be primarily determined by biases that serve production ease, thereby improving fluency (Claim 3). These three claims...
متن کاملCan word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?
Arguments concerning the relative role of semantic and grammatical factors in word formation have proven to be a wedge issue in current debates over the nature of linguistic representation and processing. In the present paper, we re-examine claims by Ramscar [Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 45-94.] that...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1342-3363,1884-7080
DOI: 10.5363/tits.17.9_54